- Correction
- Open access
- Published:
Correction: a comparative study of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and pelvic MRI in newly diagnosed prostate cancer
BMC Medical Imaging volume 24, Article number: 249 (2024)
The Original Article was published on 30 July 2024
Correction to: Ye et al. BMC Medical Imaging (2024) 24:192 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01376-4.
Following the publication of the Original Article, the authors discovered that Tables 2 and 3 contained errors. The tables were mistakenly included in their original, unmodified form, leading to discrepancies between the tables and the rest of the paper.
In statistical work, the authors used a “2” to label patients with PSA levels greater than 10. PSA less than 10 was marked with “1”, and the number of patients with PSA levels higher than 10 and lower than 10 were counted respectively.
However, in Table 3, “1” and “2” were wrongly counted as the PSA levels of patients. Therefore, certain parts of the article need to be updated accordingly.
Incorrect.
Correct.
In the Results section:
-
The maximum diameter of the PCa detected by MRI was 31.1 ± 17.5 mm.
In the second paragraph of Discussion section:
-
In our study, 9 patients had inconsistent results in 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI, with PI-RADS ≤ 4.
-
According to our study results, we suggest that patients with PI-RADS ≤ 3 points receive MRI combined with 18 F-PSMA PET/CT diagnosis, which can reduce the rate of missed diagnosis of prostate cancer, improve patient prognosis, and provide a better choice for clinical practice, which also needs further research to verify our views.
In the third paragraph of Discussion section:
-
There was a mild to moderately positive correlation between serum PSA level and the maximum diameter of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT mass, SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG.
The Original Article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The online version of the original article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01376-4.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ye, Z., Kou, Y., Shen, J. et al. Correction: a comparative study of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and pelvic MRI in newly diagnosed prostate cancer. BMC Med Imaging 24, 249 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01412-3
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01412-3