Skip to main content
Download PDF

The diagnostic accuracy of triphasic abdominal CT in detecting esophageal varices

BMC Medical Imaging volume 24, Article number: 214 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In Tanzania, triphasic abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) is a more accessible and non-invasive alternative for diagnosing esophageal varices, though its accuracy has not been thoroughly evaluated, therefore this study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of triphasic abdominal CT in detecting esophageal varices using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) as the gold standard among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding at Muhimbili National Hospital (MNH).

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted at MNH from January 2021 to May 2023. We sampled upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients who underwent both OGD and triphasic abdominal CT using non-probability consecutive sampling. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy of triphasic abdominal CT were assessed against OGD findings.

Results

In a study of 200 participants, esophageal varices were detected in 54% by OGD and 53.5% by CT. We observed 105 true positives, 2 false positives, 90 true negatives, and 3 false negatives. Triphasic abdominal CT demonstrated a sensitivity of 97.2%, specificity of 97.8%, PPV of 98.1%, NPV of 96.8%, and an accuracy of 97.5%. Extraluminal findings included portal venous thrombosis in (22%), splenic collateral (51.5%), ascites (32%), hepatocellular carcinoma (13%), and periportal fibrosis (32%).

Conclusion

Triphasic abdominal Computed Tomography can be used as a reliable and non-invasive alternative modality for diagnosing and screening esophageal varices in resource-limited settings.

Peer Review reports

Background

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a serious global emergency, with esophageal varices being a significant cause, especially in Tanzania where it accounts for 57% of cases [1,2,3]. Esophageal varices, from portal hypertension, affect up to 40% of cirrhotic patients, with a 10-30% annual hemorrhage risk and a 20-35% mortality rate at first bleeding [4,5,6,7]. Liver cirrhosis from Hepatitis B, alcohol, and schistosomiasis are major risk factors for portal hypertension [2, 3, 8,9,10,11].

Oesophaphagoduodenoscopy (OGD) is a gold standard tool for diagnosing and treating esophageal varices in upper gastrointestinal bleeding [12,13,14]. However, restricted access to OGD correlates with unfavorable disease outcomes [3, 15, 16]. Several studies have reported that triphasic abdominal CT showed a non-invasive alternative diagnostic modality to detect esophageal varices and other related pathologies that may impact patient management [6, 17,18,19].

Esophageal varices are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly in regions like Tanzania where liver cirrhosis is prevalent [1, 2]. In Tanzania, where CT is widely available from Regional Referral Hospitals to the National Hospital level, the accuracy of triphasic abdominal CT has yet to be evaluated. Demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy of triphasic abdominal CT can Improve patient outcomes, enhance resource utilization and guide clinical practice.

This study is innovative in several key aspects including its comprehensive evaluation in resource limited settings, blinded assessment ensuring objective comparison of the two imaging modalities and paving way for further prospective, multi-center studies, and contribute to the global body of knowledge on non-invasive diagnostic techniques for esophageal varices, potentially influencing international clinical practices.

Materials and methods

This diagnostic accuracy study was part of a broader study on UGIB profiles at MNH. We included 200 participants aged 20 to 90 years, with UGIB history who underwent both OGD and triphasic abdominal CT. On average, the interval between OGD and triphasic abdominal CT scans was 4 weeks. Exclusion criteria included patients without retrievable CT or endoscopic records. Ethical approval was obtained from the MUHAS Institutional Review Board (MUHAS-REC-04-2023-1617).

Diagnostic triphasic abdominal CT and OGD

Axial triphasic abdominal CT scans were reviewed in consensus by the principal investigator, who has over 3 years of experience in clinical research, and an experienced radiologist with over 5 years of expertise in CT imaging, specifically in hepatic and gastrointestinal conditions. Both were blinded with the endoscopy findings. Varices were identified as linear or nodular enhancing lesions near or within the esophageal lumen [20]. Assessments were blinded to endoscopic results, which served as the gold standard. Triphasic abdominal CT scans were performed using a standard protocol that included non-contrast, arterial, and portal venous phases. The scans were acquired using a multi-detector CT scanner with thin-slice reconstruction to enhance the detection of esophageal varices and related abnormalities. Endoscopy was performed by an experienced gastroenterologist with a minimum of five years of experience who was blinded with the CT findings. Esophageal varices defined as the presence of dilated submucosal veins in the distal esophageal lumen. These veins may appear as red or bluish streaks or as distinct, raised, and worm-like structures [21,22,23].

Data Management and Analysis

Data were collected using structured forms and analyzed using SPSS version 26. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of triphasic abdominal CT were calculated against OGD results. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 200 participants were included, with males being more predominant than females (120 [60%] vs. 80 [40%]). A wide range of patient age was seen and it varied between 20 and 90 years with a median age of 47 years. In our patient cohort, esophageal varices were significantly associated with hepatitis B virus (OR = 6.07, 95% CI: 2.162–17.085, p < 0.001), alcoholic liver disease (OR = 5.95, 95% CI: 2.559–13.835, p < 0.001), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (OR = 3.66, 95% CI: 1.780–7.467, p < 0.001), and hepatic schistosomiasis (OR = 3.77, 95% CI: 1.830–7.788, p < 0.001).

Among the 200 participants, esophageal varices by OGD were found in more than half of them 108(54%). Triphasic abdominal CT neared the OGD findings where it revealed esophageal varices in patients 107(53.5%) and absent in 93(46.5%) of the studied participants. In addition to esophageal varices, triphasic abdominal CT also showed evidence of gastric varices in 53 patients (26.5%), liver cirrhosis in 49(24.5%), portal venous thrombosis in 44(22%), para esophageal varices in 39(19.5%), and splenic varices in 103 (51.5%), Periportal fibrosis in 64(32%) and Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)26(13%).

There were 105 true positives had both endoscopy and CT signs of esophageal varices, 2 false positive on CT scan, 90 true negatives on both modalities, and 3 false negative cases which had positive signs on endoscopy only with endoscopy taken as a gold standard for the diagnosis of esophageal varices. (Table 1).

Table 1 Cross tabulation of triphasic abdominal CT in detecting esophageal varices using OGD as a gold standard. (N = 200)
Full size table

Based on these findings, triphasic abdominal CT has a sensitivity of 97.2%, specificity of 97.8%, PPV of 98.1%, and NPV of 96.8% in the detection of esophageal varices. The overall diagnostic accuracy of triphasic abdominal CT in detecting esophageal varices was 97.5%.

figure a

Discussions

Our study demonstrated that triphasic abdominal CT has a high diagnostic accuracy in detecting esophageal varices. These findings are in line with a study conducted at Kot Khawaja Saeed Teaching Hospital, Lahore in Pakistan, which reported similar findings with high sensitivity (98.4%), specificity (97.6%), and accuracy (98.1%) [6].The similarity in sampling technique and imaging protocol could explain the observed performance. However, these findings were slightly lower than those reported at Aga Khan University Hospital, in Pakistan and Egypt and in Pakistan where abdominal CT has an accuracy of range of 99%to 100% [5, 17, 19]. The variations observed could be clarified by the inclusion of exclusively cirrhotic patients in the studies mentioned, alongside the utilization of CT esophagography in the Egyptian study, which is a highly effective protocol for detecting esophageal varices.

Also, our study findings were higher than those reported in the United States, Iran, and China where the sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy ranged from 63.49 to 90%; 50–72.58% and 72.58 and 83.5% respectively [13, 24, 25] The observed differences could be attributed to the small sample sizes and the exclusive inclusion of cirrhotic patients in the abovementioned studies.

The challenges in diagnosing esophageal varices in low-income countries are multifaceted. The limited availability of endoscopic services poses a significant challenge in the timely diagnosis and management of esophageal varices. Additionally, the high costs and the need for specialized training to operate and maintain endoscopic equipment further exacerbate this issue. As a result, many patients in low-income countries do not have access to adequate diagnostic services, leading to delays in diagnosis and treatment. This often results in poorer outcomes for patients, as timely intervention is crucial in managing esophageal varices and preventing complications such as bleeding. Triphasic abdominal CT offers a non-invasive, widely accessible alternative that can help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes. In Tanzania and similar settings, enhancing the availability and utilization of triphasic abdominal CT for esophageal varices diagnosis could significantly improve patient care.

The high sensitivity and specificity of triphasic abdominal CT make it a valuable diagnostic tool, especially in resource-limited settings where OGD may not be readily available. However, the possibility of false-positive and false-negative results necessitates a cautious interpretation of CT findings. In our study, the false positive and false negative cases observed could be attributed to the inherent limitations of imaging techniques and interpretation variability. For instance, small varices or those in atypical locations might be missed on CT, while CT might overcall varices due to overlapping structures or artifacts.

The prevalence of esophageal varices in our study cohort was 54%, which led to a high positive predictive value (PPV) and a low negative predictive value (NPV). This prevalence is lower compared to other studies conducted in Pakistan, which could be explained by differences in the sample population, as those studies included only patients with chronic liver disease [6, 17, 18]. This comparison supports the reliability of our PPV and NPV calculations.

Our study also identified portosystemic collaterals, liver cirrhosis, periportal fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma, consistent with other studies [5, 6, 26]. Triphasic abdominal CT, unlike OGD, detects these extra-esophageal abnormalities, highlighting its additional benefit, especially in chronic liver disease which helps guide treatment and projecting the prognosis in the managed patients.

Our study has a limitation. It was a retrospective design of the study hence selection bias. A single-center study at a tertiary hospital. This limits its generalizability.

Conclusions

Triphasic abdominal Computed Tomography demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in detecting esophageal varices, with a sensitivity of 97.2%, specificity of 97.8%, PPV of 98.1%, NPV of 96.8%, and an overall accuracy of 97.5%. These findings suggest that triphasic abdominal CT can be a reliable and non-invasive alternative for diagnosing and screening esophageal varices in resource-limited settings.

Data availability

Dataset used in this analysis are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CT:

Computed Tomography

OGD:

Oesophagoduodensoscopy

MNH:

Muhimbili National Hospital

PPV:

Positive predictive value

NPV:

Negative predictive value

UGIB:

Upper gastrointestinal bleeding

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

References

  1. Chofle AA, Jaka H, Koy M et al. Mortality among patients admitted with hematemesis in Mwanza, Tanzania: a prospective cohort study. Published Online 2014:1–10.

  2. Moledina SM. Risk factors for mortality among patients admitted with upper gastrointestinal bleeding at a tertiary hospital: a prospective cohort study. Published Online 2017:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-017-0712-8

  3. Opio CK, Rejani L, Kazibwe F, Ocama P. The diagnostic accuracy of routine clinical findings for detection of esophageal varices in rural sub-saharan Africa where schistosomiasis is endemic. Afr Health Sci. 2019;19(4):3225–34. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v19i4.46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunda DW, Kilonzo SB, Mamballah Z, et al. The magnitude and correlates of esophageal varices among newly diagnosed cirrhotic patients undergoing screening fibre optic endoscope before incident bleeding in North-Western Tanzania; a cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-1123-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moftah SG, Kamal S, Hanna ATK. ORIGINAL ARTICLE CT esophagography: non-invasive screening and grading of esophageal varices in cirrhosis. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2014;45(2):263–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrnm.2014.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Butt HA, Nasim R, Javed K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of triphasic CT scan abdomen in the diagnosis of distal esophageal varices taking endoscopic findings as gold standard. Prof Med J. 2022;29(12):1831–7. https://doi.org/10.29309/tpmj/2022.29.12.7213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elghezewi A, Hammad M, El-Dallal M, Mohamed M, Sherif A, Frandah W. Trends in hospitalizations of Esophageal Varices from 2011 to 2018: a United States Nationwide Study. Gastroenterol Res. 2023;16(3):171–83. https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kiringa SK, Quinlan J, Ocama P, Mutyaba I, Kagimu M. Prevalence, short term outcome and factors associated with survival in patients suffering from upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a resource limited setting, the case of Mulago hospital in Kampala, Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2020;20(1):426–36. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v20i1.49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Alema ON, Martin DO, Okello TR. Endoscopic findings in upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients at Lacor hospital, northern Uganda. Afr Health Sci. 2012;12(4):518–21. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v12i4.19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ather DM, Sarfraz DM, Zikarya DM. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; endoscopic findings in patients. Prof Med J. 2017;24(02):335–41. https://doi.org/10.17957/tpmj/17.3711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jemilohun AC, Akande KO, Ngubor TD, Oku O, Ogunmola MI, Adesuyi YO. Endoscopic findings in patients with Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in Ogun State. Nigeria Cureus. 2022;14(3). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23637.

  12. Malghani WS, Malik R, Chaudhary FMD, et al. Spectrum of endoscopic findings in patients of Upper gastrointestinal bleeding at a Tertiary Care Hospital. Cureus. 2019;11(4):4–10. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deng H, Qi X, Zhang Y, Peng Y, Li J, Guo X. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced computed tomography for esophageal varices in liver cirrhosis: a retrospective observational study. J Evid Based Med. 2017;10(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Manuscript ANIH. Public Access. 2015;39(2):251–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-0057-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaka H, Koy M, Liwa A et al. A fibreoptic endoscopic study of upper gastrointestinal bleeding at Bugando Medical Centre in northwestern Tanzania: a retrospective review of 240 cases. Published Online 2012:1–9.

  16. Deng H, Qi X, Guo X. Computed tomography for the diagnosis of varices in liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta- analysis of observational studies. Postgrad Med. 2017;0(0). https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2017.1241664.

  17. Hassan M, Husen Y, Abbasi S un, nisa, Hussain Z. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multidetector Computed Tomography in Detection of Esophageal Varices. 2019;11(1):8–13. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3933

  18. Yu NC, Margolis D, Hsu M, Raman SS, Lu DSK. Detection and grading of esophageal varices on liver CT: comparison of standard and thin section multiplanar reconstructions in diagnostic accuracy. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(3):643–9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.5458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Abdel B, Dessouky M, Sayed E, Abdel M. Multidetector CT oesophagography: an alternative screening method for endoscopic diagnosis of oesophageal varices and bleeding risk multidetector CT oesophagography: an alternative screening method for endoscopic diagnosis of oesophageal varices and ble. Arab J Gastroenterol. 2015;14(3):99–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajg.2013.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim H, Choi D, Gwak GY, et al. Evaluation of esophageal varices on liver computed tomography: receiver operating characteristic analyses of the performance of radiologists and endoscopists. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(9):1534–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05849.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marušić M, Klemenčić A, Perić RT, Hauser G. Gastroesophageal variceal bleeding—an overview of current treatment options. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2018;LXXXI(June):305–17.

  22. Hwang JH, Shergill AK, Acosta RD, Chandrasekhara V, Chathadi KV, Anton Decker G, Early DS, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Foley KQ, Fonkalsrud L, Jue T, Khashab MA, Lightdale JR, Raman Muthusamy V, Pasha SF, Saltzman JR, Sharaf R, Cash BD, American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80(2):221–7.

  23. Diagnosis E, Gastro-INtestinal, Esophageal varices Bleeding. HHS Public Access. 2016;1–20.

  24. Perri RE, Chiorean MV, Fidler JL, et al. A prospective evaluation of computerized tomographic (CT) scanning as a screening modality for esophageal varices. Hepatology. 2008;47(5):1587–94. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Salahshour F, Mehrabinejad MM, Rashidi Shahpasandi MH, et al. Esophageal variceal hemorrhage: the role of MDCT characteristics in predicting the presence of varices and bleeding risk. Abdom Radiol. 2020;45(8):2305–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02585-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. El-Assaly H, Metwally LIA, Azzam H, Seif-Elnasr MI. A comparative study of multi-detector CT portography versus endoscopy in the evaluation of gastro-esophageal varices in portal hypertension patients. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2020;51(1).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support given by all staff members at Muhimbili Radiology department and the medical records department. No funds were received for conducting this research.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    Suzana Lukoo, Balowa Musa, Lilian Salingwa & Ahmed Jusabani

  2. Muhimbili National Hospital, Malik Road, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    Gerard Mpemba

  3. Aga Khan Hospital Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

    Ahmed Jusabani

Authors
  1. Suzana Lukoo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Balowa Musa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lilian Salingwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gerard Mpemba
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ahmed Jusabani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SL: Designed the study, acquired and analyzed the data, interpreted the data and did manuscript drafting; BM: assisted in designing the study, data interpretation, and critically reviewed the manuscript for its intellectual content; GM &LS: assisted in acquiring the data and critically reviewed the manuscript for its intellectual content; AJ: assisted with data analysis, and critically reviewed the manuscript for its intellectual content. All Authors read and approved the final Manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suzana Lukoo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The research proposal underwent a comprehensive review and obtained ethical approval from the MUHAS Institutional Review Board (MUHAS-REC-04-2023-1617). Due to the retrospective design of the study, a waiver for informed consent was requested. Permission to collect data was also obtained from the director-general of MNH. The confidentiality of all information and data was strictly upheld throughout the study. Patient identities were not collected or utilized, and no identifying information was included in the data analysis. Furthermore, access to the data was restricted to the investigators alone.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lukoo, S., Musa, B., Salingwa, L. et al. The diagnostic accuracy of triphasic abdominal CT in detecting esophageal varices. BMC Med Imaging 24, 214 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01388-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01388-0

Keywords

BMC Medical Imaging

ISSN: 1471-2342

Contact us