Table 7 Limits of agreement (LOA) of all different sampling strategies
| Â | Reader 1, 1st time vs. Reader 1, 2nd time | Reader 1, 1st time vs. Reader 2 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sampling strategies at segmental level (S1‒S8) | ||||||||
|  | Mean LOA | Maximum LOA | Minimum LOA | Proportion with LOA < 1.5% | Mean LOA | Maximum LOA | Minimum LOA | Proportion with LOA < 1.5% |
1S-ROI | 5.34 | 7.43 | 3.62 | 0% | 5.77 | 8.08 | 4.32 | 0% |
3S-ROI | 3.66 | 4.69 | 3.07 | 0% | 3.75 | 5.15 | 2.79 | 0% |
1L-ROI | 3.06 | 4.83 | 1.84 | 0% | 3.37 | 5.11 | 2.59 | 0% |
3L-ROI | 1.90 | 3.15 | 1.01 | 22% (2/9) | 2.35 | 2.83 | 1.86 | 0% |
Sampling strategies at whole-liver level | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | LOA | LOA | ||||||
4S-ROI | 2.11 | 2.61 | ||||||
4L-ROI | 1.55 | 1.88 | ||||||
9S-ROI | 1.83 | 2.24 | ||||||
27S-ROI | 1.21 | 1.39 | ||||||
9L-ROI | 1.11 | 1.12 | ||||||
27L-ROI | 0.65 | 0.82 | ||||||