Skip to main content

Table 4 Receiver operating characteristic analysis and diagnostic performance of TNR, Thickness, tumor margin, and their combination

From: Can lymphovascular invasion be predicted by contrast-enhanced CT imaging features in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A preliminary retrospective study

Variables

AUC

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Cutoff value

TNR

0.669 (0.594–0.745)

0.594 (0.522–0.663)

0.831 (0.633–0.932)

0.449 (0.312–0.565)

0.415 (0.341–0.433)

0.892 (0.843–0.907)

1.595

Thickness

0.739 (0.662–0.816)

0.716 (0.647–0.778)

0.644 (0.475–0.785)

0.708 (0.457–0.826)

0.519 (0.431–0.556)

0.842 (0.768–0.857)

1.545

Tumor margin

0.712 (0.642–0.782)

0.766 (0.701–0.824)

0.549 (0.380–0.698)

0.827 (0.642–0.907)

0.618 (0.516–0.662)

0.824 (0.780–0.833)

0.500

Combination

0.820 (0.754–0.885)

0.797 (0.734–0.851)

0.678 (0.525–0.780)

0.848 (0.652–0.928)

0.656 (0.596–0.687)

0.860 (0.826–0.871)

0.375

  1. AUC, area under the curve; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value