Table 3 Comparison between CS TOF-MRA and CTA for evaluating MMD patients after surgical revascularization
CS TOF-MRA | CTA | P value* | |
|---|---|---|---|
STA–MTA bypass visualization, n (%) | 0.011 | ||
Grade 0 | 4 (18.2) | 5 (22.7) | |
Grade 1 | 1 (4.5) | 7 (31.8) | |
Grade 2 | 4 (18.2) | 5 (22.7) | |
Grade 3 | 13 (59.1) | 5 (22.7) | |
Neovascularization, n (%) | 0.005 | ||
Grade 0 | 9 (40.9) | 15 (68.2) | |
Grade 1 | 7 (31.8) | 4 (18.2) | |
Grade 2 | 3 (13.6) | 3 (13.6) | |
Grade 3 | 3 (13.6) | 0 (0) | |
Moyamoya vessels, n (%) | 0.036 | ||
Grade 0 | 0 (0.0) | 1 (5.0) | |
Grade 1 | 1 (5.0) | 6 (30.0) | |
Grade 2 | 10 (50.0) | 9 (45.0) | |
Grade 3 | 9 (45.0) | 4 (20.0) |