Skip to main content

Table 1 Performance of each model (mean, \(95\%\) confidence interval)

From: Development of CNN models for the enteral feeding tube positioning assessment on a small scale data set

Method

AUC

F1 Score

Accuracy

ECE

(larger is better)

(larger is better)

(larger is better)

(smaller is better)

Random

0.49, [0.45 to 0.53]

0.39, [0.35 to 0.43]

0.48, [0.44 to 0.52]

0.11, [0.10 to 0.12]

No Pre-Train

0.56, [0.50 to 0.62]

0.32, [0.23 to 0.41]

0.69, [0.67 to 0.71]

0.12, [0.10 to 0.14]

ImageNet

0.67, [0.71 to 0.63]

0.53, [0.49 to 0.57]

0.74, [0.71 to 0.77]

0.12, [0.09 to 0.15]

C2L

0.73, [0.70 to 0.76]

0.62, [0.57 to 0.67]

0.79, [0.77 to 0.81]

0.15, [0.13 to 0.17]

Proposed

0.76, [0.71 to 0.81]

0.64, [0.58 to 0.70]

0.78, [0.75 to 0.81]

0.09, [0.07 to 0.11]