Skip to main content

Table 3 The relationship between LCA and IMV position relationship at IMA root level and the clinical characteristics of the subjects

From: A study on spinal level, length, and branch type of the inferior mesenteric artery and the position relationship between the inferior mesenteric artery, left colic artery, and inferior mesenteric vein

 

Type A adjacent type (n = 160)

Type B distant type (n = 47)

t/χ2

P

Gender

0.395

0.53

 Male, n (%)

90 (56.3%)

24 (51.1%)

  

 Female, n (%)

70 (43.7%)

23 (48.9%)

  

Age, mean ± SD (years)

59.38 ± 13.30

59.59 ± 14.12

− 0.093

0.926

Height, mean ± SD (cm)

165.72 ± 8.02

165.23 ± 7.14

0.378

0.706

Body mass, mean ± SD (kg)

67.61 ± 12.37

68.86 ± 16.24

-0.564

0.573

Body mass index, mean ± SD (kg/m2)

24.51 ± 3.43

25.19 ± 5.78

− 1.008

0.314

DIMA-AB, mean ± SD (mm)

41.06 ± 6.76

43.48 ± 6.56

− 2.162

0.032

DIMA, mean ± SD (mm)

99.25 ± 13.29

101.12 ± 13.09

− 0.852

0.395

DIMA-SMA, mean ± SD (mm)

73.58 ± 9.84

70.19 ± 9.24

2.107

0.036

dIMA, mean ± SD (mm)

36.88 ± 9.93

43.54 ± 8.59

− 4.164

0.000

IMA type

0.398

0.819

 Type I

90 (56.3%)

24 (51.1%)

  

 Type II

37 (23.1%)

12 (25.5%)

  

 Type III

33 (20.6%)

11 (23.4%)

 Â