Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison between the BT and traditional groups

From: A practical biphasic contrast media injection protocol strongly enhances the aorta and pulmonary artery simultaneously using a single CT angiography scan

Group

Traditional (Aorta scan)

Traditional (PA scan)

BT I

BT II

Test of homogeneity of variances

ANOVA P-value

Sex

M:21(53%)

M:26(70%)

M:10(38%)

0.004

 

Age (years)

73.35 ± 18.22

57.49 ± 13.84

62.85 ± 15.22

0.311

 < 0.001

PA density (HU)

195.33 ± 71.44

302.20 ± 86.37

324.03 ± 99.90

285.19 ± 108.70

0.014

 

Aorta density (HU)

234.95 ± 94.18

165.68 ± 80.95

285.18 ± 64.99

294.78 ± 64.48

0.005

 

Radiation dose (mSv)

20.07 ± 7.78

11.85 ± 5.55

9.07 ± 3.44

0.029

 

Group

Traditional versus BT I

Traditional versus BT II

BT I versus BT II

   

Post hoc analysis using the Games-Howell method (p-value)

Sex

0.380

0.682

0.061

   

Radiation dose (mSv)

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

0.079

   

Group

T_Ao versus T_PA

T_Ao versus BT I

T_Ao versus BT II

T_PA versus BT I

T_PA versus BT II

BT I versus BT II

PA density (HU)

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

0.003

0.737

0.907

0.479

Aorta density(HU)

0.004

0.038

0.017

 < 0.001

 < 0.001

0.938

  1. Bold text indicating a statistically significant difference with a P-value less than 0.05
  2. PA: pulmonary artery; BT: bolus-tracking; ANOVA: Analysis of variance; T_Ao: Traditional(Aorta scan); T_PA: Traditional(PA scan)