Skip to main content

Table 4 Grading and comparisons of the signal intensity of the perilymph (n = 42)

From: Signal and morphological changes in the endolymph of patients with vestibular schwannoma on non-contrast 3D FLAIR at 3 Tesla

 

PPI (n = 42)

Grading of signal intensity

Comparisons of signal intensity between affected and unaffected sides

Perilymph

Affected side Mean (SD)

Unaffected side Mean (SD)

AC1 value (95% CI) Affected side

AC1 value (95% CI) Unaffected side

p value (Wilcoxon signed-rank test)

Higher signal on the affected side

Equal signal

Higher signal on the unaffected side

AC1 value (95% CI)

Basal turn of CD

1.69 (0.64)

0.07 (0.26)

0.92 (0.83–1.02)

0.98 (0.96–1.00)

 < .0001

38

4

0

0.97 (0.84–1.00)

Middle/apical turn of CD

1.67 (0.69)

0

0.93 (0.85–1.02)

1.00 (1.00–1.00)

 < .0001

37

5

0

0.97 (0.93–1.00)

Vestibule

1.67 (0.69)

0.02 (0.15)

0.98 (0.95–1.01)

0.99 (0.98–1.01)

 < .0001

37

4

1

0.94 (0.87–1.01)

Anterior SCC

1.41 (0.81)

0

0.75 (0.60–0.90)

1.00 (1.00–1.00)

 < .0001

34

8

0

0.98 (0.96–1.01)

Lateral SCC

1.36 (0.79)

0

0.75 (0.60–0.90)

1.00 (1.00–1.00)

 < .0001

33

9

0

0.99 (0.97–1.01)

Posterior SCC

1.45 (0.77)

0

0.86 (0.77–0.95)

0.99 (0.98–1.01)

 < .0001

35

7

0

0.99 (0.97–1.01)

Overall mean

1.45

0.02

   

36

6

0

 
  1. PPI positive perilymphatic images, SD standard deviation, CI confidence interval, CD cochlear duct, SCC semicircular canal
  2. Signal intensity was graded as follows: 0 = similar to that of CSF in the cerebellopontine angle cistern (normal signal), 1 = higher than that of CSF without sharply delineated borders, and 2 = markedly higher than that of CSF with sharply delineated borders