Skip to main content

Table 3 Pairwise comparisons of differences in volumetric analysis times among segmentation methods in two groups

From: Efficiency of a deep learning-based artificial intelligence diagnostic system in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage volume measurement

Statistics

ICH without IVH group

ICH with IVH group

Algorithm versus CTP

ABC/2 score versus CTP

Algorithm versus ABC/2 score

Algorithm versus CTP

Difference, min

    

Range (min, max)

− 25.12,− 0.07

− 25.17,− 0.37

− 1.08,− 0.37

− 31.05,− 1.12

Mean

− 5.96

− 6.15

0.18

15.22

Median

− 4.51

− 4.66

− 0.16

− 13.97

IQR

− 7.88,− 2.17

− 8.03,− 2.47

− 0.28,− 0.03

− 18.97.− 8.64

P

 < 0.001*

 < 0.001*

0.002*

 < 0.001†

  1. ICH indicates intracerebral hemorrhage; IVH, intraventricular hemorrhage; CTP, CT− based planimetry; IQR, interquartile range
  2. *Friedman test, followed by pairwise comparison
  3. † Wilcoxon signed− rank test