Skip to main content

Table 5 Literature comparison of BI-RADS agreement

From: Agreement in breast lesion assessment and final BI-RADS classification between radial and meander-like breast ultrasound

  

Final BI-RADS assessment

Shape

Orientation

Margin

Echo pattern

Posterior acoustic features

Meander-like ultrasound versus radial ultrasound in real time

This study

2020

0.76

0.47

0.35

0.68

0.40

0.47

Meander-like ultrasound versus meander-like ultrasound in real time

Yoon [26]

2011

0.37

     

Berg [27]

2006

0.52

0.62

0.72

0.67

0.25

0.38

Berg # [34]

2006

 

0.14

  

0.61

0.45

Meander-like ultrasound versus meander-like ultrasound by retrospective review of static images

Cho [25]

2019

0.49/0.52‡/0.63†

     

Choi [12]

2018

0.70

0.67

0.63

0.55

0.57

0.60

Lee ҂ [24]

2016

0.04–0.59

0.17–0.60

0.25–0.77

0.05–0.52

0.05–0.55

0.33–0.64

Schwab [13]

2016

0.585–0.738

     

Park [14]

2015

0.478

0.538

0.429

0.257

0.430

0.438

Elverici [15]

2013

0.35

0.45

0.66

0.33

0.41

0.54

Youk [16]

2013

0.38

0.61

0.62

0.39

0.54

0.57

Berg [17]

2012

0.53/0.59*

0.59

0.46

0.51

0.41

0.64

Cosgrove [18]

2012

0.59

0.58

0.53

0.38

  

Schaefer [19]

2011

0.634

     

Abdullah [20]

2009

0.3

0.64

0.70

0.36

0.58

0.47

Lee [21]

2008

0.53 / 0.62**

0,49

0.56

0.33

0.37

0.49

Park [22]

2007

0.49

0.42

0.61

0.32

0.36

0.53

Lazarus [23]

2006

0.28

0.66

0.61

0.40

0.29

0.40

Meander-like ultrasound versus ABUS

Yun [35]

2019

0.61

     

Vourtsis [36]

2018

0.99

     

Barr [37]

2017

0.49

     
  1. #Phantom-Study
  2. Improved final assessment after first‡, and second † quality workshop
  3. ҂Including κ values of faculty members, senior and junior residents
  4. *Improved final assessment after feedback
  5. **κ = 0.53 final BI-RADS assessment 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5 / κ = 0.62 final BI-RADS assessment 3, 4, 5