Skip to main content

Table 5 Literature comparison of BI-RADS agreement

From: Agreement in breast lesion assessment and final BI-RADS classification between radial and meander-like breast ultrasound

   Final BI-RADS assessment Shape Orientation Margin Echo pattern Posterior acoustic features
Meander-like ultrasound versus radial ultrasound in real time
This study 2020 0.76 0.47 0.35 0.68 0.40 0.47
Meander-like ultrasound versus meander-like ultrasound in real time
Yoon [26] 2011 0.37      
Berg [27] 2006 0.52 0.62 0.72 0.67 0.25 0.38
Berg # [34] 2006   0.14    0.61 0.45
Meander-like ultrasound versus meander-like ultrasound by retrospective review of static images
Cho [25] 2019 0.49/0.52‡/0.63†      
Choi [12] 2018 0.70 0.67 0.63 0.55 0.57 0.60
Lee ҂ [24] 2016 0.04–0.59 0.17–0.60 0.25–0.77 0.05–0.52 0.05–0.55 0.33–0.64
Schwab [13] 2016 0.585–0.738      
Park [14] 2015 0.478 0.538 0.429 0.257 0.430 0.438
Elverici [15] 2013 0.35 0.45 0.66 0.33 0.41 0.54
Youk [16] 2013 0.38 0.61 0.62 0.39 0.54 0.57
Berg [17] 2012 0.53/0.59* 0.59 0.46 0.51 0.41 0.64
Cosgrove [18] 2012 0.59 0.58 0.53 0.38   
Schaefer [19] 2011 0.634      
Abdullah [20] 2009 0.3 0.64 0.70 0.36 0.58 0.47
Lee [21] 2008 0.53 / 0.62** 0,49 0.56 0.33 0.37 0.49
Park [22] 2007 0.49 0.42 0.61 0.32 0.36 0.53
Lazarus [23] 2006 0.28 0.66 0.61 0.40 0.29 0.40
Meander-like ultrasound versus ABUS
Yun [35] 2019 0.61      
Vourtsis [36] 2018 0.99      
Barr [37] 2017 0.49      
  1. #Phantom-Study
  2. Improved final assessment after first‡, and second † quality workshop
  3. ҂Including κ values of faculty members, senior and junior residents
  4. *Improved final assessment after feedback
  5. **κ = 0.53 final BI-RADS assessment 3, 4a, 4b, 4c, 5 / κ = 0.62 final BI-RADS assessment 3, 4, 5