Skip to main content

Table 2 Tabulated values for the image characteristics for both investigated scanning methods

From: The concordance in lesion detection and characteristics between the Anatomical Intelligence and conventional breast ultrasound Scan method

 

No. of lesions value

k value

K value sub-feature

CUS

AUS-1

AUS-2

C-A

A1-2

C-A

A1-2

Boundary

   

0.7424

0.6531

  

Morphology

   

0.7217

0.6762

  

Aspect ratio

   

0.6741

0.6439

  

Internal echo

   

0.6419

0.6137

  

 Cyst

161

132

149

  

0.8157

0.8756

 Mixed echogenic

66

73

62

  

0.5132

0.4783

 Solid

99

94

98

  

0.7425

0.7774

BI-RADS assessment

   

0.6241

0.5981

  

 2

171

141

148

  

0.5768

0.5174

 3

128

122

130

  

0.8243

0.8786

 4A, 4B, 4C, 5

27

36

31

  

0.5132

0.4378

  1. Data in bold are almost perfect agreement
  2. CUS represents the conventional US scan method; AUS represents the AI breast US scan method; C-A represents the k Value between the AI breast US scan method and AI breast US scan method; A1-2 represents k Value between the two readers of AI breast US scan method
Back to article page

BMC Medical Imaging

ISSN: 1471-2342

Contact us