Table 5 Quantitative result comparison of different models on the CHASE_DB1

Azzopardi et al. [13]

0.7585

0.9587

0.9387

-

-

-

0.9487

Fraz et al. [15]

0.7224

0.9711

0.9469

-

-

-

0.9712

Li et al. [9]

0.7507

0.9793

0.9581

-

-

-

0.9716

Jiang et al. [20]

0.8640

0.9745

0.9668

-

-

-

0.9810

Liskowski et al. [21]

0.7816

0.9836

0.9826

-

-

-

0.9823

Jin et al. [28]

0.8229

0.9821

0.9724

0.7510

-

-

0.9863

Alom et al. [33]

0.7459

0.9836

0.9622

-

0.7810

-

0.9803

Laibacher et al. [31]

-

-

0.9703

-

-

0.8006

0.9666

Mo et al. [37]

0.8147

0.9844

0.9674

-

-

-

0.9885

Proposed method

0.7972

0.9896

0.9889

0.8205

0.7560

0.8352

0.9874