Skip to main content

Table 1 Diagnostic efficacy of BSGI, ultrasound, mammography, and MRI

From: Comparison of BSGI, MRI, mammography, and ultrasound for the diagnosis of breast lesions and their correlations with specific molecular subtypes in Chinese women

Approach Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV
BSGI 91.7 (210/229)*a 80.7 (130/161)*b 87.1 (210/241)*c 87.2 (130/149)*d
MRI 92.5 (147/159) 69.7 (53/76) 86.5 (147/170) 81.5 (53/65)
Mammography 77.3 (177/229) 74.5 (120/161) 81.2 (177/218) 69.8 (120/172)
Ultrasound 82.1 (188/229) 70.8 (114/161) 80.0 (188/235) 73.5 (114/155)
  1. (PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value)
  2. *a) BSGI to Mammography, χ2 = 18.15, P < 0.01, to Ultrasound, χ2 = 9.28,P < 0.01
  3. *b) BSGI to Ultrasound, χ2 = 4.33,P < 0.05. *c) BSGI to Ultrasound, χ2 = 4.42, P < 0.05
  4. *d) BSGI to Mammography, χ2 = 14.16,P < 0.01, to Ultrasound, χ2 = 9.0,P < 0.01
Back to article page

BMC Medical Imaging

ISSN: 1471-2342

Contact us