Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Detecting rate of pancreatic cysts of CT and MRI from 2013 to 2016

From: Difference analysis in prevalence of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

  2013 P value 2014 P value 2015 P value 2016 P value
CT MRI CT MRI CT MRI CT MRI
Age (y) 63.21 ± 14.25 61.06 ± 14.86 ... 62.78 ± 13.65 61.37 ± 13.44 ... 62.43 ± 14.12 60.81 ± 13.51 ... 60.83 ± 14.43 60.15 ± 13.83 ...
Gender (M/F) 93/165 81/154 ... 104/141 122/153 ... 106/141 129/186 ... 115/173 166/291 ...
Number (%) 258/12774 (2.02%) 235/7413 (3.17%) < 0.001 245/12901 (1.90%) 275/8319 (3.31%) < 0.001 247/13103 (1.89%) 315/9800 (3.21%) < 0.001 288/15432 (1.87%) 457/12567 (3.64%) < 0.001
Median Size (mm) 12.0 12.0 ... 14.0 13.0 15.0 14.0 ... 12.0 11.0 ...
< 20 mm 165 170 < 0.001 151 209 < 0.001 150 236 < 0.001 185 361 < 0.001
≥20 mm 93 65 0.247 94 66 0.595 97 79 0.572 103 96 0.339
  1. Abbreviations: CT computed tomography, MRI magnetic resonance imaging, M male, F female