Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Difference analysis in prevalence of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions between computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Feb 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yingxin Chen
17 Mar 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nariman Nezami
10 Apr 2019 Author responded Author comments - Shuo Zhu
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Apr 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yingxin Chen
5 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rossano Girometti
12 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Shuo Zhu
Resubmission - Version 3
12 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Shuo Zhu
Resubmission - Version 4
13 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 May 2019 Editorially accepted
24 May 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12880-019-0341-5

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement