Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of patients and procedures

From: Performance of a feature-based algorithm for 3D-3D registration of CT angiography to cone-beam CT for endovascular repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms

Patient

Age (years)

Gender

BMI (kg/m2)

Aneurysm type

Aneurysm size (mm)1

Procedure

1

69

M

30

Common iliac artery aneurysm

40

Iliac Branched

2

82

F

34.4

Juxta-renal

62

FEVAR

3

81

M

23.2

Thoraco-abdominal

90

BEVAR

4

71

M

23.8

Juxta-renal

72

FEVAR

5

72

M

27.5

Juxta-renal

58

FEVAR

6

75

M

23.8

Juxta-renal

65

Chimney EVAR

7

76

M

24.3

Juxta-renal

65

FEVAR

8

67

M

24.7

Juxta-renal

70

FEVAR

9

67

M

25.8

Supra-renal

83

BEVAR

10

83

M

33.3

Juxta-renal

62

FEVAR

11

76

M

23.3

Juxta-renal

60

EVAR

12

69

M

24.5

Thoraco-abdominal

90

BEVAR

13

70

F

27.3

Thoraco-abdominal

100

BEVAR

14

73

M

19.6

Thoraco-abdominal

62

BEVAR

  1. F, female; M, male; FEVAR, fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair; BEVAR, fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair
  2. 1 Aneurysm size was defined as the maximal aortic diameter perpendicular to the line of flow