This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The effect of initial teaching on evaluation of left ventricular volumes by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison between complete and intermediate beginners and experienced observers
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 14 November 2016
Accepted: 6 April 2017
Published: 17 May 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Taigang He|
|27 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yuchi Han|
|27 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard B. Stacey|
|4 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Erik Hedström|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|4 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|17 May 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12880-017-0197-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.