Skip to main content

Table 4 PSNR ± stdev for ADC images for the patient data experiments (24 images/patient for 20 patient) across different methods with P-values comparing L 2 and HL0 methods with CD-SFCRF, respectively

From: Sparse reconstruction of compressive sensing MRI using cross-domain stochastically fully connected conditional random fields

Sampling rate (%)

L2 (dB)

P-value

HL0 (dB)

P-value

CD-SFCRF (dB)

17

17.20 ± 0.61

p ≪ 0.0001

19.35 ± 0.58

0.88

19.50 ± 0.57

32

18.05 ± 0.48

p ≪ 0.0001

21.66 ± 0.54

0.89

21.72 ± 0.55

47

18.72 ± 0.32

p ≪ 0.0001

22.94 ± 0.39

0.89

23.16 ± 0.37

  1. Bold face indicates the method with the highest performance metric
Back to article page

BMC Medical Imaging

ISSN: 1471-2342

Contact us