Skip to main content

Table 4 PSNR ± stdev for ADC images for the patient data experiments (24 images/patient for 20 patient) across different methods with P-values comparing L 2 and HL0 methods with CD-SFCRF, respectively

From: Sparse reconstruction of compressive sensing MRI using cross-domain stochastically fully connected conditional random fields

Sampling rate (%) L2 (dB) P-value HL0 (dB) P-value CD-SFCRF (dB)
17 17.20 ± 0.61 p 0.0001 19.35 ± 0.58 0.88 19.50 ± 0.57
32 18.05 ± 0.48 p 0.0001 21.66 ± 0.54 0.89 21.72 ± 0.55
47 18.72 ± 0.32 p 0.0001 22.94 ± 0.39 0.89 23.16 ± 0.37
  1. Bold face indicates the method with the highest performance metric