Skip to main content

Table 3 PSNR ± stdev for DWI images for the patient data experiments (24 images/b-value for 4 b-values/patient for 20 patients) across different methods with P-values comparing L 2 and HL0 methods with CD-SFCRF, respectively

From: Sparse reconstruction of compressive sensing MRI using cross-domain stochastically fully connected conditional random fields

Sampling rate (%)

L2 (dB)

P-value

HL0 (dB)

P-value

CD-SFCRF (dB)

17

26.90 ± 1.86

p ≪ 0.0001

28.46 ± 2.50

p ≪ 0.0001

28.75 ± 2.22

32

31.92 ± 2.32

p ≪ 0.0001

33.39 ± 3.03

p ≪ 0.0001

33.61 ± 2.17

47

36.45 ± 2.67

p ≪ 0.0001

37.85 ± 2.48

p ≪ 0.0001

37.99 ± 2.11

  1. Bold face indicates the method with the highest performance metric