Skip to main content

Table 2 Regions whose label agreement improves with multiple atlases

From: Mindboggle: Automated brain labeling with multiple atlases

Labels

L

R

frontal pole

  

sup. frontal

  

mid. frontal

 

11

inf. frontal

  

orbital

13

8

precentral

 

11

postcentral

  

sup. parietal

8

9

inf. parietal

  

temporal pole

 

4

sup. temporal

6

11

mid. temporal

17

12

inf. temporal

17

11

fusiform

7

11

lingual

  

occipital lobe

  

cingulate

9

 

insula

9

3

  1. The effect of multiple atlases on label agreement varies by manually labeled region. Here we compare label agreements obtained by Mindboggle for each region by different numbers of atlases randomly selected from either of the two subject groups (up to 19 atlases for each of the 20 subjects). Numerical entries denote the minimum number of atlases that result in significantly higher label agreements than for single atlas data, by region (p ≪ 0.0001 for all regions except inferior temporal gyms: p < 0.01 and right temporal pole: p < 0.0002). For example, an entry of "9" means that significantly higher results were obtained using 9, 10, 11,... to 19 atlases versus using one atlas). The significance test is the same as that applied to the whole brain label agreement data.