Skip to main content

Table 5 The AUC values and corresponding ranksum p-values for classification of AD-NC, NC-MCI, and MCI-AD

From: Brain region’s relative proximity as marker for Alzheimer’s disease based on structural MRI

(a) Baseline data, not adjusted

 

NC-AD AUC

p −value

NC-MCI AUC

p −value

MCI-AD AUC

p −value

HP/ICV

0.878

<0.001

0.783

<0.001

0.635

<0.001

WB/ICV

0.724

<0.001

0.648

<0.001

0.648

<0.001

Surface all

0.818

<0.001

0.765

<0.001

0.740

<0.001

Surface func

0.877

<0.001

0.785

<0.001

0.766

<0.001

Surface potato

0.849

<0.001

0.785

<0.001

0.736

<0.001

Procrustes all

0.769

<0.001

0.679

<0.001

0.707

<0.001

Procrustes func

0.784

<0.001

0.656

<0.001

0.712

<0.001

Procrustes potato

0.752

<0.001

0.640

<0.001

0.705

<0.001

(b) Baseline whole brain, bl. volume adjusted

 

NC-AD AUC

p −value

NC-MCI AUC

p −value

MCI-AD AUC

p −value

Surface all

0.752

<0.001

0.664

<0.001

0.574

0.024

Surface func

0.839

<0.001

0.695

<0.001

0.597

0.006

Surface potato

0.787

<0.001

0.705

<0.001

0.600

0.003

Procrustes all

0.678

<0.001

0.566

0.001

0.520

0.022

Procrustes func

0.689

<0.001

0.539

0.006

0.572

<0.001

Procrustes potato

0.650

<0.001

0.513

0.010

0.582

<0.001

(c) Baseline hippocampus volume, bl. volume adjusted

 

NC-AD AUC

p −value

NC-MCI AUC

p −value

MCI-AD AUC

p −value

Surf all

0.639

0.001

0.608

<0.001

0.688

<0.001

Surf nfunc

0.739

<0.001

0.615

<0.001

0.729

<0.001

Surf potato

0.667

<0.001

0.622

<0.001

0.671

<0.001

Procrustes all

0.624

0.001

0.575

0.010

0.663

<0.001

Procrustes nfunc

0.631

<0.001

0.553

0.068

0.671

<0.001

Procrustes potato

0.574

0.041

0.529

0.328

0.658

<0.001

  1. The last two markers were divided in three groups all, functional, and potato-shaped. 5(a) is the non-adjusted case, 5(b) and 5(c) is adjusted by whole brain fraction and hippocampus fraction, respectively. All markers were able to significantly distinguish the classes. Our markers were still significant after adjustment for the two volume scores, but AUC scores were in general lower than the non-adjusted scores. The surface connectivity score for the functional groups performed the best.