Table 4 Comparison of scoring in current study to published data
From: A workstation-integrated peer review quality assurance program: pilot study
Author | O’Keeffe | Siegle* | Borgstede | Soffa** | Jackson | Swanson | Bender |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reference | Current | 27 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 19 | 22 |
Year | 2013 | 1998 | 2004 | 2004 | 2009 | 2012 | 2012 |
Grades | |||||||
0 | 0.2 | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
1 | 99.1 | 95.6 | 96.3 | 96.5 | 97.1 | 96.2 | 96.5 |
2 | 0.1 | 1.4 | 2.9 | NA | 2.5 | 3.6 | NA |
3 | 0.5 | NA | NA | NA | 0.3 | 0.2 | NA |
4 | 0.1 | NA | NA | NA | 0.1 | 0.0 | NA |
Non-discrepant (0–1) | 99.3 | 95.6 | 96.3 | 96.5 | 97.1 | 96.2 | 96.5 |
Concordant (0–2) | 99.4 | 97.0 | 99.2 | NA | 99.6 | 99.8 | NA |
Discrepant (2–4) | 0.7 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 3.8 | 3.5 |
Clinically Significant Discrepancy(3–4) | 0.6 | 3.0 | 0.8 | N/A | 0.4 | 0.2 | NA |