Table 3 Scoring of reviewed cases
From: A workstation-integrated peer review quality assurance program: pilot study
Modality | Score 0 | Score 1 | Score 2 | Score 3 | Score 4 | Total | Non-discrepant (0–1) | Concordant (0–2) | Discrepant (2–4) | Clinically Significant Discrepancy (3–4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Radiography (%) | 0 (0) | 605 (99.0) | 2 (0.3) | 4 (0.7) | 0 (0) | 611 | 605 (99.0) | 607 (99.3) | 6 (1.0) | 4 (0.7) |
Fluoroscopy (%) | 0 (0) | 50 (98.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.0) | 51 | 50 (98.0) | 50 (98.0) | 1 (2.0) | 1 (2.0) |
Mammography (%) | 0 (0) | 385 (100.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 385 | 385 (100.0) | 385 (100.0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
Nuclear Medicine (%) | 1 (0.4) | 218 (98.2) | 0 (0) | 3 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 222 | 219 (98.6) | 219 (98.6) | 3 (1.4) | 3 (1.4) |
Ultrasound (%) | 2 (0.4) | 432 (99.1) | 0 (0) | 2 (0.5) | 0 (0) | 436 | 434 (99.5) | 434 (99.5) | 2 (0.5) | 2 (0.5) |
Total (%) | 3 (0.2) | 1690 (99.1) | 2 (0.1) | 9 (0.5) | 1 (0.1) | 1705 | 1693 (99.3) | (1695 (99.4) | 12 (0.7) | 10 (0.6) |