Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Patient Discomfort Associated with the Use of Intra-arterial Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Randomized Controlled Trials

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Jan 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Peter McCullough
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Downes
14 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Richard Katholi
19 Mar 2011 Author responded Author comments - Peter McCullough
Resubmission - Version 3
19 Mar 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Peter McCullough
Resubmission - Version 4
7 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Peter McCullough
Resubmission - Version 5
14 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Peter McCullough
Resubmission - Version 6
21 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
24 May 2011 Editorially accepted
24 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1471-2342-11-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement