Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance summary of the deep TL models using different ensemble methods applied on the testing set of mammogram inputs (N – Normal, B – Benign, M – Malignant)

From: Deep transfer learning with fuzzy ensemble approach for the early detection of breast cancer

TL Models

Output Classes

Precision (%)

Recall (%)

F1 Score (%)

Overall Accuracy (%)

VGG11

N

95.013

96.284

96.149

95.833

B

96.246

95.27

96.088

M

96.271

95.946

96.113

VGG11 with Weighted Average

N

95.333

96.622

96.225

96.059

B

96.246

95.27

96.151

M

96.611

96.284

96.202

VGG11 with Sugeno Integral

N

95.667

96.959

96.479

96.396

B

96.918

95.608

96.487

M

96.622

96.622

97.395

VGG11 with Fuzzy Ranking using modified Gompertz Function

N

96.346

97.973

97.474

97.072

B

97.938

96.284

97.321

M

96.959

96.959

97.386

Inception v3

N

95.973

96.622

96.224

96.284

B

96.599

95.946

96.157

M

96.284

96.284

96.183

Inception v3 with Weighted Average

N

96.309

96.959

97.316

96.622

B

96.622

96.622

97.259

M

96.939

96.284

97.212

Inception v3 with Sugeno Integral

N

96.333

97.635

97.498

97.072

B

97.288

96.959

97.351

M

97.611

96.622

97.333

Inception v3 with Fuzzy Ranking using modified Gompertz Function

N

97.659

98.649

98.489

98.086

B

98.305

97.973

98.392

M

98.299

97.635

98.244

ResNet50

N

96.321

97.297

97.516

96.622

B

96.928

95.946

96.773

M

96.622

96.922

97.491

ResNet50 with Weighted Average

N

96.333

97.635

97.689

96.847

B

96.939

96.284

97.258

M

97.279

96.622

97.614

ResNet50 with Sugeno Integral

N

96.678

98.311

97.766

97.297

B

97.279

96.622

97.369

M

97.952

96.959

97.727

ResNet50 with Fuzzy Ranking using modified Gompertz Function

N

98.986

98.986

98.916

98.986

B

99.321

98.649

99.152

M

98.658

99.324

99.298