Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Rapid Cartesian versus radial acquisition: comparison of two sequences for hepatobiliary phase MRI at 3 tesla in patients with impaired breath-hold capabilities

  • Johannes Budjan1Email author,
  • Philipp Riffel1,
  • Melissa M. Ong1,
  • Stefan O. Schoenberg1,
  • Ulrike I. Attenberger1 and
  • Daniel Hausmann1
BMC Medical ImagingBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:32

DOI: 10.1186/s12880-017-0203-y

Received: 28 November 2016

Accepted: 28 April 2017

Published: 9 May 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - MEHMET AKÇAKAYA
21 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philipp Wiggermann
9 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Johannes Budjan
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
28 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
9 May 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12880-017-0203-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University

Advertisement