Ultrasonographic prevalence and characteristics of non-palpable thyroid incidentalomas in a hospital-based population in a sub-Saharan country
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 3 December 2016
Accepted: 27 February 2017
Published: 4 March 2017
Thyroid incidentalomas (TI) are highly prevalent asymptomatic thyroid nodules with ultrasound as the best imaging modality for their detection and characterization. Although they are mostly benign, potential for malignancy is up to 10–15%.
In sub-Saharan Africa little data exists on the prevalence and risk categorization of TI. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and ultrasound characteristics of non-palpable thyroid incidentalomas among adults in sub-Saharan setting.
A cross sectional study was carried out between March and August 2015, at two university teaching hospitals. Sampling was consecutive and included all adults aged ≥ 16 years, presenting for any ultrasound other than for the thyroid, with no history or clinical signs of thyroid disease, and no palpable thyroid lesion. Ultrasound was done using 4 to 11 MHz linear probes. Subjects with diffuse thyroid abnormalities were excluded. Variables studied were age, gender, thyroid volume, ultrasound characteristics of thyroid nodules, TIRADS scores. Differences were considered statistically significant for p-value < 0.05.
The prevalence of TI was 28.3% (126 persons with TI /446 examined). This prevalence was 46.2% in population ≥ 61-year-old; 6.3% in population ≤ 20-year-old; 33.3% for females and 18.4% for males (p < 0.001). Of the 241 TI found, 49.4% were cysts, 33.6% solid, 17.0% mixed; 37.8% <5 mm and 22% >10 mm. Solid TI were mainly hyperechoic (42.0%), 3/81 were markedly hypoechoic. Sixty-nine out of 126 persons with TI (54.8%) had at least two nodules. Solitary nodules were predominant in the age group ≤20 years. Of 241 TI, 129 (53.5%) were classified TIRADS 2, 81 (33.6%) TIRADS 3, 25 (10.4%) TIRADS 4A, 6 (2.5%) TIRADS 4B, and none TIRADS 5. Characteristics associated with increased risk of malignancy where mostly founded on solid nodules (p < 0.000) and nodules larger than 15 mm (p < 0.001).
Thyroid incidentalomas were very frequent with a prevalence of 28.3% and potential risk of malignancy in 12.9%. Prevalence had a tendency to increase with age and in female. Cystic nodules were the most prevalent. Potential for malignancy would be increased for larger and solid nodules.
KeywordsThyroid incidentaloma Thyroid nodule TIRADS Prevalence Sub-Saharan country
Thyroid incidentalomas (TIs) are asymptomatic nodules discovered accidentally during imaging studies indicated for other reasons . Ultrasound is the best imaging modality for the detection and characterization of these nodules [2, 3]. Various studies have reported a prevalence between 50 and 67% [2, 4–7]. They are mostly benign. However, there is a potential for malignancy in less than 10–15% [1, 2, 8], depending on the method of sampling and the characteristics of nodules.
TIs therefore represent a clinical challenge and a source of anxiety to patients. The clinician needs to correctly access the risk of each nodule, in order to correctly determine if and what further investigation is necessary. The TIRADS (Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System) permits this classification with recommendations on the need for cytologic verification or ultrasound surveillance [6, 7, 9, 10].
In sub-Saharan Africa little data exists on the prevalence and risk categorization of TI . The aim of this study was therefore, to determine their prevalence in the adult population, and describe their ultrasound characteristics based on TIRADS.
A cross-sectional study was carried out in two university teaching hospitals from March to August 2015.
Persons aged ≥ 16 years, referred to the diagnostic imaging department for ultrasound scans other than that of the thyroid, who accepted freely to participate in the study were included. They had no history, palpable or other clinical signs of thyroid disease. A consecutive non-probabilistic sample was taken. Patients with diffuse thyroid disease were excluded. Verbal informed consent from participants was required.
Thyroid ultrasound procedure and image interpretation
Malignancy risk (%)
▪ Normal thyroid US
▪ Simple cyst
▪ Spongiform nodule
▪ ‘White knight’ aspect
▪ Isolated macrocalcification
▪ Typical sub-acute thyroiditis
Probably benign aspects
▪ None of the high suspicious aspect
Low suspicious aspect
▪ None of the high suspicious aspect
▪ Moderately hypoechogenic
High suspicious aspects with 1 or 2 signs and no adenopathy
▪ Taller-than-wide shape
▪ Irregular or microlobulated margins
▪ Marked hypoechogenicity
High suspicious aspects with ≥ 3 signs and/or adenopathy
▪ Taller-than-wide shape
▪ Irregular or microlobulated margins
▪ Marked hypoechogenicity
A preconceived data collection form was filled out for each subject. Variables studied included: age, gender, thyroid volume, ultrasound characteristics of any nodules found (echogenicity, calcifications, borders, height/breadth in transverse plane), and TIRADS score for each TI. The CSPro 5.1 software was used to create the data entry mask anonymously. Stata version 11 and SPSS version 18 software enabled the analysis of the data. The chi square test assessed the association between the TIRADS score and various socio-demographic and sonographic characteristics. The comparison of the prevalences were performed using the Fisher exact test. Results were expressed in numbers and percentages for categorical variables. Differences were considered statistically significant for p < 0.05.
Prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas (TIs) with respect to age and gender
Of the 446 individuals included, 126 had thyroid incidentalomas giving a prevalence of TIs of 28.3%. This prevalence was 33.3% among women (p < 0.001) and 46.6% in individuals aged more than 60 years (Table 2).
Characteristics of incidentalomas
The location of TI was 54.0% (130/241) in the right lobe and 3.7% in the isthmus (9 cases). Most were inferiorly (base) located 38.2% (92/241), followed by location within the corpus (31.1%).
Distribution of incidentalomas with respect to size and tissue structure
< 5 mm
In regard to solid nodules (81/241), 42.0% were hyperechoic, 29.6% isoechoic, 24.7% with moderate hypoechogenicity and 3.7% were markedly hypoechoic. 39 solid TIs had a peripheral hypoechoic ring.
Solid and mixed incidentalomas had well defined borders in 91.0% of cases; ten nodules (8.2%) had indistinct borders. Eight nodules had macrocalcifications, two had microcalcifications. Half of them did not show any form of vascularization on Doppler examination (pulse and power). Peripheral vascularization was seen in 39.3% of cases (48/122). Only one nodule presented predominantly central vascularization.
TIRADS classification of TIs
TIRADS classification of thyroid incidentalomas with respect to tissue structure
Prevalence of TIRADS 4 thyroid incidentalomas with respect to size
< 5 mm
n (TIRADS 2, 3 and 4)
Malignant potential (4A + 4B)
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and ultrasound characteristics of thyroid incidentalomas, amongst adult in a hospital based setting. The prevalence of TIs was 28.3% with 49.4% being cysts, and 87.1% classified TIRADS 2 or 3.
Our population is comparable to those studied by Papini and al in Italy  and by Kim and al in Seoul , with female predominance. In our study women represented more than 2/3 of the population. This could be explained by the higher proportion of women referred to the imaging department, as well as in the general population in our setting.
Prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas on ultrasound examination
In our series, the prevalence of TIs was estimated at 28.3% compared to 27% in southern Finland . This is slightly higher than the 22.4% reported by Olusola-Bello in Nigeria  and 21% by Kamran and al in Karachi, Pakistan , both in 2014. In 2009, in Germany, Guth and al  reported 68% prevalence with 53% < 5 mm. The prevalence therefore varies with age, sex, technology available (operator, probe frequency), the minimum size of nodules, and the presence or absence of iodine deficiency in the population. High resolution machines now permit the detection of much smaller nodules, a few millimeters in size .
Prevalence of TIs was significantly higher in females (33.3%; p < 0.001), than males (18.4%). This has been also reported by authors in Nigeria , Pakistan  and Iran . It is generally known that the prevalence of TIs amongst females is four times that of males . This prevalence increases with age, with maximum prevalence in persons > 60 years. TIs are considered as part of the physiologic aging process of the thyroid gland [10, 11, 15, 16]. This might also explain the increase in prevalence with age in our population.
Ultrasound characteristics of thyroid incidentalomas
The locations of TIs had a tendency to be in the right lobe (54%). This result was similar to the previous reports [2, 11, 16]. It might be explained by the difference of the native sizes between right and left lobes, that the right lobe was supposed to be 1.2 folds larger than the left [19–21].
Almost half of TIs were cystic in nature (49.4%) in line with other studies [7, 10, 11]. Solid nodules (33.61%) were mainly hyperechoic (42.0%). Other authors found a predominance of isoechoic or hyperechoic nodules too [2, 7, 14, 18, 22]. Characteristics to indicate malignant potentials were rare in our series (one case with lobulated margins, two cases with microcalcifications). Liebeskind and al  had similar findings. Different studies showed marked variability in the size of nodules. We found 22% of nodules ≥ 10 mm in our series, compared to 43% by Kamran and al  and 66.5% by Kim and al . Fine needle aspiration is usually recommended for nodules ≥ 10 mm; those < 5 mm are usually transitory, difficult to characterize and to aspirate.
TIRADS classification (Table 1) of thyroid incidentalomas
We had similar prevalence of TIRADS 2 nodules (54.5%) as Olusola-Bello and al (54.0%) in Nigeria ; these two populations share similar characteristics. The risk of malignancy in our series was 12.9%, which falls within the range of 7–15% described in existing literature [2, 3, 9, 14]. There was a significant association between risk of malignancy and solidity of nodules (p < 0.000): of the 31 nodules classified TIRADS 4, 77.4% were solid and 22.6% of mixed echogenicity. Solidity of nodules is considered suspicious of malignancy in the TIRADS classification, as opposed to purely cystic and spongiform nodules. There is also an association between size and risk of malignancy (p < 0.001), the prevalence of potentially malignant nodules increases with size (14.3% of TIRADS 4 nodules were 10–15 mm, 22% were > 15 mm). This reiterates the need for cytological examination of nodules > 10 mm whereas those < 5 mm do not need this [10, 14].
We did not find an association between the TIRADS score and age or sex. Capelli and al did not find a significant difference in the prevalence of malignant nodules among the two sexes . Kim and al  reported a significantly higher prevalence among females who however represented 4/5 of their study population.
There were some limitations in this study: first this study was conducted in a hospital-based setting; and second no cytological analysis of nodules was performed because participants were either reticent to do so, or lost to follow up. A community based study may better determine the true prevalence of thyroid incidentalomas in the general population.
Thyroid incidentalomas were very frequent with a prevalence of 28.3% and a potential risk of malignancy in 12.9%. Prevalence had a tendency to be increased with age and female sex. Purely cystic nodules are the most frequent. Risks of malignancy would be increased for a larger size and would be higher for TIs of solid components.
Thyroid imaging reporting and data system
The authors wish to thank Dr Martine TCHUEM TCHUENTE for helping with the patients’ selection and records.
None. The authors have no funding source to disclose.
Availability of data and materials
Data of this study are available and can be shared on request.
BM conceived the study and participated in its design, data collection, statistical analysis and drafting of the manuscript. JRMT participated in the study design, review of the images and statistical analysis. SDF participated in data collection, the review of the images, statistical analysis and the drafting of the manuscript. FD participated in data collection and proof-reading of the manuscript. EMW participated in data collection and proof-reading of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Our study received clearance from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty and the research authorization from the hospital. Each subject was given details on the study, after which they gave free consent to participate. The consent from participants was verbal. Confidentiality and anonymity were respected.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Wilhelm S. Evaluation of thyroid incidentaloma. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(3):485–97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bianchini A, Crescenzi A, Taccogna S, Nardi F, et al. Risk of malignancy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules: predictive value of ultrasound and color-Doppler features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(5):1941–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kang HW, No JH, Chung JH, Min Y-K, Lee M-S, Lee M-K, et al. Prevalence, clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics of thyroid incidentalomas. Thyroid Off J Am Thyroid Assoc. 2004;14(1):29–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hoang JK, Lee WK, Lee M, Johnson D, Farrell S. US Features of Thyroid Malignancy: Pearls and Pitfalls. RadioGraphics. 2007;27(3):847–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim KM, Park JB, Kang SJ, Bae KS. Ultrasonographic guideline for thyroid nodules cytology: single institute experience. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013;84(2):73–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kwak JY, Han KH, Yoon JH, Moon HJ, Son EJ, Park SH, et al. Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules: a step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk. Radiology. 2011;260(3):892–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Russ G, Leboulleux S, Leenhardt L, Hegedüs L. Thyroid Incidentalomas: Epidemiology, Risk Stratification with Ultrasound and Workup. Eur Thyroid J. 2014;3(3):154–63.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Koike E, Noguchi S, Yamashita H, et al. Ultrasonographic characteristics of thyroid nodules: Prediction of malignancy. Arch Surg. 2001;136(3):334–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Moifo B, Takoeta EO, Tambe J, Blanc F, Fotsin JG. Reliability of Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) Classification in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Thyroid Nodules. Open J Radiol. 2013;3(3):103–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tramalloni J, Wémeau JL. Consensus français sur la prise en charge du nodule thyroïdien : ce que le radiologue doit connaître. EMC Radiol Imag Médicale Cardiovasc Thorac Cervicale. 2012;7(4):1–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Olusola-Bello MA, Agunloye AM, Adeyinka AO. Ultrasound prevalence and characteristics of incidental thyroid lesions in Nigerian adults. Afr J Med Med Sci. 2013;42(2):125–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tramalloni J, Monpeyssen H. Échographie de la thyroïde. 01/2013 (2ème édition). ELSEVIER / MASSON; 2013. 191 p.
- Russ G, Bigorgne C, Royer B, Rouxel A, Bienvenu-Perrard M. Le système TIRADS en échographie thyroïdienne. J Radiol. 2011;92(7–8):701–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim D-L, Song K-H, Kim SK. High prevalence of carcinoma in ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodules. Endocr J. 2008;55(1):135–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Karaszewski B, Wilkowski M, Tomasiuk T, Szramkowska M, Klasa A, Obołończyk L, et al. The prevalence of incidentaloma--asymptomatic thyroid nodules in the Tricity (Gdansk, Sopot, Gdynia) population. Endokrynol Pol. 2006;57(3):196–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kamran M, Hassan N, Ali M, Ahmad F, Shahzad S, Zehra N. Frequency of thyroid incidentalomas in Karachi population. Pak J Med Sci. 2014;30(4):793–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Guth S, Theune U, Aberle J, Galach A, Bamberger CM. Very high prevalence of thyroid nodules detected by high frequency (13 MHz) ultrasound examination. Eur J Clin Invest. 2009;39(8):699–706.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mohammadi A, Amirazodi E, Masudi S, Pedram A. Ultrasonographic Prevalence of Thyroid Incidentaloma in Bushehr, Southern Iran. Iran J Radiol. 2009;6(2):65–8.Google Scholar
- Şahin E, Elboğa U, Kalender E. Regional reference values of thyroid gland volume in Turkish Adults. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2015;143(3–4):141–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Müller-Leisse C, Tröger J, Khabirpour F, Pöckler C. Normal values of thyroid gland volume. Ultrasound measurements in schoolchildren 7 to 20 years of age. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1946. 1988;113(48):1872–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moifo B, Djomou F, Dongmo Fomekong S, Tapouh Jr M, Manka’a Wankie E, Bola A, Ndjolo A, Gonsu Fotsin J. Ultrasound biometrics of normal thyroid gland of Cameroonian adults. J Afr Imag Med. 2016;8(3):102–6.Google Scholar
- Cappelli C, Castellano M, Pirola I, Cumetti D, Agosti B, Gandossi E, et al. The predictive value of ultrasound findings in the management of thyroid nodules. QJM. 2006;100(1):29–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liebeskind A, Sikora AG, Komisar A, Slavit D, Fried K. Rates of malignancy in incidentally discovered thyroid nodules evaluated with sonography and fine-needle aspiration. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(5):629–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar