Hippocampal volumes are important predictors for memory function in elderly women
© Ystad et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 22 January 2009
Accepted: 22 August 2009
Published: 22 August 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Jan 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|22 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Jagust|
|2 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Arvid Lundervold|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|2 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|1 Jul 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Jagust|
|4 Aug 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Arvid Lundervold|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|4 Aug 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|Resubmission - Version 7|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 7|
|12 Aug 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Arvid Lundervold|
|Resubmission - Version 8|
|12 Aug 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 8|
|22 Aug 2009||Editorially accepted|
|22 Aug 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2342-9-17|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.