The Swimmer's view: does it really show what it is supposed to show? A retrospective study
© Rethnam et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 10 July 2007
Accepted: 15 January 2008
Published: 15 January 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Jul 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arvind Kulkarni|
|29 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick Platzer|
|20 Oct 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Ulfin Rethnam|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Oct 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arvind Kulkarni|
|3 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick Platzer|
|9 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Ulfin Rethnam|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Jan 2008||Editorially accepted|
|15 Jan 2008||Article published||10.1186/1471-2342-8-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.