Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Sidestream dark field images of the microcirculation: intra-observer reliability and correlation between two semi-quantitative methods for determining flow

  • Sandra M Petersen1Email author,
  • Gorm Greisen1,
  • Simon Hyttel-Sorensen1 and
  • Gitte H Hahn1
BMC Medical Imaging201414:14

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-14-14

Received: 30 July 2013

Accepted: 9 April 2014

Published: 6 May 2014

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
30 Jul 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
8 Feb 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ebru Ergenekon
11 Mar 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - nathalie faye
27 Mar 2014 Author responded Author comments - Sandra Meinich Petersen
Resubmission - Version 3
27 Mar 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Apr 2014 Editorially accepted
6 May 2014 Article published 10.1186/1471-2342-14-14

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neonatology, Copenhagen National Hospital, Rigshospitalet