Sidestream dark field images of the microcirculation: intra-observer reliability and correlation between two semi-quantitative methods for determining flow
© Petersen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 30 July 2013
Accepted: 9 April 2014
Published: 6 May 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ebru Ergenekon|
|11 Mar 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - nathalie faye|
|27 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Sandra Meinich Petersen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Apr 2014||Editorially accepted|
|6 May 2014||Article published||10.1186/1471-2342-14-14|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.