Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Utility of cardiac magnetic resonance in assessing right-sided heart failure in sarcoidosis

  • Jacob Lønborg1, 2,
  • Michael Ward1, 3,
  • Anthony Gill5,
  • Stuart M Grieve1, 4 and
  • Gemma A Figtree1, 3Email author
BMC Medical Imaging201313:2

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-13-2

Received: 22 May 2012

Accepted: 31 December 2012

Published: 11 January 2013

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
22 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jul 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mouaz Al-Mallah
9 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ntobeko Ntusi
13 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ryan Aleong
24 Oct 2012 Author responded Author comments - Jakob Lonborg
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Oct 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ntobeko Ntusi
28 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ryan Aleong
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
31 Dec 2012 Editorially accepted
11 Jan 2013 Article published 10.1186/1471-2342-13-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

North Shore Heart Research Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, University of Sydney
Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet
Department of Cardiology, Royal North Shore Hospital
Department of Radiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Department of Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital