A workstation-integrated peer review quality assurance program: pilot study
© O’Keeffe et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 20 August 2012
Accepted: 26 June 2013
Published: 4 July 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Aug 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|29 Sep 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jacob Sosna|
|26 Jan 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rathachai Kaewlai|
|15 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kerry Siminoski|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|15 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jacob Sosna|
|4 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rathachai Kaewlai|
|2 Jun 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Kerry Siminoski|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Jun 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|26 Jun 2013||Editorially accepted|
|4 Jul 2013||Article published||10.1186/1471-2342-13-19|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.