Quantitative and qualitative assessment of structural magnetic resonance imaging data in a two-center study
- Sima Chalavi1, 2Email author,
- Andrew Simmons3, 4, 5,
- Hildebrand Dijkstra6,
- Gareth J Barker†3, 5 and
- A A T Simone Reinders†1, 2
© Chalavi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 13 January 2012
Accepted: 27 July 2012
Published: 6 August 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Jan 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frithjof Kruggel|
|12 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Norris|
|29 Jun 2012||Author responded||Author comments - sima chalavi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Jun 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Norris|
|17 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Frithjof Kruggel|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jul 2012||Editorially accepted|
|6 Aug 2012||Article published||10.1186/1471-2342-12-27|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.