Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Does health differ between participants and non-participants in the MRI-HUNT study, a population based neuroimaging study? The Nord-Trøndelag health studies 1984–2009

  • Lasse-Marius Honningsvåg1Email author,
  • Mattias Linde1, 2,
  • Asta Håberg1,
  • Lars Jacob Stovner1, 2 and
  • Knut Hagen1, 2
BMC Medical Imaging201212:23

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-12-23

Received: 18 May 2012

Accepted: 17 July 2012

Published: 30 July 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
18 May 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lewis Kuller
27 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marianne Haapea
9 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Lasse-Marius Honningsvåg
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jul 2012 Editorially accepted
30 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2342-12-23

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Norwegian National Headache Centre, St. Olavs University Hospital