Skip to main content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review

  • Edward Azavedo1, 4,
  • Sophia Zackrisson2Email author,
  • Ingegerd Mejàre3 and
  • Marianne Heibert Arnlind3, 4
BMC Medical Imaging201212:22

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2342-12-22

Received: 20 April 2012

Accepted: 23 June 2012

Published: 24 July 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting

Original Submission
20 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 May 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - rosalind given-wilson
4 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pavel Crystal
20 Jun 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sophia Zackrisson
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Jun 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jun 2012 Editorially accepted
24 Jul 2012 Article published 10.1186/1471-2342-12-22

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Karolinska Institutet
Department of Clinical Sciences in Malmö, Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö
Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU)
LIME/MMC, Karolinska Institutet