Absent cervical spine pedicle and associated congenital spinal abnormalities - a diagnostic trap in a setting of acute trauma: case report
© Guggenberger et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 16 August 2010
Accepted: 9 November 2010
Published: 9 November 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Aug 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - James Harrop|
|19 Sep 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aristomenis K Exadaktylos|
|4 Oct 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Roman Guggenberger|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Oct 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Oct 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Aristomenis K Exadaktylos|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Nov 2010||Editorially accepted|
|9 Nov 2010||Article published||10.1186/1471-2342-10-25|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.