Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Jan 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
10 Feb 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - K V Chalam |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
10 Feb 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
17 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Zawadzki |
17 Mar 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Miguel Materin |
25 Mar 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - K V Chalam |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
25 Mar 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
12 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - K V Chalam |
12 May 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Robert Zawadzki |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
24 May 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - K V Chalam |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
24 May 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
2 Jun 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - K V Chalam |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
2 Jun 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
7 Jun 2010 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Jun 2010 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2342-10-11 |
You can find further information about peer review here.